• Innovation
    Promotion of technological and clinical innovation in critical care
  • Grip
    In-vitro and in-vivo research adherent to clinical practice and relevant for ICU every-day activities
  • Sharing
    International spread of ideas, innovation and research

Our philosophy

The GRIP (Group for Research in Intensive care in Pavia) is founded in 2015 by a group of intensivists working at Intensive Care Units of Policlinico S. Matteo in Pavia. We are a group of young doctors and researchers who dedicated in the last years great energy, enthusiasm and time to develop new ideas, improve technology and optimize quality of care for critical patients. Our group is characterized by strong international connections for both clinical research and technological developement. Our missions are:

 

  1. 1
    Innovation

    Intensive care units are highly technological; therefore, development of innovative instruments and optimization of existing ones can have a deep clinical impact. We have strong national and international collaborations with research and development sections of industries involved in the field and with many universities in order to push technology forward.

  2. 2
    Grip

    Our aim is to promote and support a research projects gripping the real world. First, this means we support research with high clinical impact and strong everyday applicability. Second, we support researchers, offering work possibilities for young professionals.

  3. 3
    Sharing

    We aim to share our ideas, projects and results with scientific community; we have strong national and international research cooperation and  researcher exchange programs with multiple university centers.

Multimodality imaging in cardiogenic shock: state-of-the art


Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Aug 1;29(4):381-391. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001068. Epub 2023 Jun 22. From Pubmed   Guido Tavazzi, Francesco Corradi, Christophe Vandenbriele, Carlos L Alviar  

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is emerging evidence on the role of the multimodality imaging in the setting of cardiogenic shock. The utility of different imaging modalities, along with their pitfalls and limitations, and their integration in a multiparametric approach are discussed in the current review. Recent findings: The evaluation of congestion and perfusion in patients with shock has allowed a better understanding of the underlying physiopathological mechanisms. Integration of echocardiography, using more physiological parameters, with lung ultrasound, as well as the Doppler evaluation of abdominal blood flow dynamics, has led to a better stratification in patinas with hemodynamic instability. Summary: Although validation of the integrated approaches and single parameters are needed, the physiopathological-driven approach using ultrasound in patients with cardiogenic shock on top of the clinical and biochemical evaluation, may aid to a quicker and more detailed evaluation of patient's phenotype.  
No Events were found.

The GRIP